Draft 1: developing
your critical interpretive essay
1. Using what you have learned from your previous writing about David
Sedaris’ “Standing By,” write a formal essay that pulls all the pieces together
into a clear and coherent explanation of your reading. Remember that your
purpose should be different from Sedaris’ purpose—your purpose should reflect
what mattered to you as you were reading, describing something (some things)
that Sedaris’ did that led you to a particular interpretation.
2. Also consider the following:
a. How do Sedaris’ writerly choices work together in order to
accomplish his overall purpose, given his context and audience—all as you
understand it from your reading?
b. As you write, use evidence from “Standing By”—quotations,
summaries, paraphrases, and images or descriptions of images—and from class
discussion to support your critical interpretation. Use this as a chance to
demonstrate how your particular understanding of this text has been arrived at
critically, so choose your supporting evidence from across the text.
3. In the writing you
turn in, remember that you’re writing to communicate. This means you should
attend to how others might interpret Sedaris’ text differently from you (and
why), so write to others in ways that address what might matter to them.
4. Bring TWO copies of
your essay and your course texts to our next class meeting.
No comments:
Post a Comment